House votes to overturn D.C. voting rights, crime laws


The Republican-led House has launched the primary salvo in what could possibly be a long-running feud with the District of Columbia over self-government within the nation’s capital.

In back-to-back votes, the House voted Thursday to overturn a sweeping rewrite of the felony code handed by the Metropolis Council final 12 months and a brand new legislation that will grant noncitizens the best to vote in native elections.

Congressional oversight of the district is written into the Structure. And whereas it has been greater than three many years since Congress outright nullified a D.C. legislation, Congress has steadily used different strategies corresponding to funds riders to alter laws on points starting from abortion funding to marijuana legalization.

The House voted 250-173 to overturn the rewrite of the felony code, which amongst different issues, decreased the utmost penalties for housebreaking, carjacking and theft. The voting rights invoice additionally was overturned by a 260-173 vote.

The strikes could also be partially symbolic since each would have to go the Democratic-held Senate and be signed by President Joe Biden. Nevertheless, each House votes garnered a notable quantity of Democratic assist with 31 Democrats voting to overturn the felony code rewrite and 42 voting to overturn the voting measure. Biden has mentioned publicly that he opposes each measures, however has not explicitly said he would veto them.

Thursday’s votes sign a brand new and brazenly combative part within the District’s tortured relationship with the federal authorities.

The talk has put D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser in a curious political place. Bowser vetoed the rewrite of the town’s felony code in January, saying the utmost penalty reductions ship “the mistaken message” on crime prevention, Bowser additionally opposed a measure that will enable for jury trials in most misdemeanor instances, saying the sudden spike in jury trials would overwhelm the native justice system. Her veto was shortly overridden by the D.C. Council in a 12-1 vote.

Republican lawmakers decried the D.C. authorities as gentle on criminals within the midst of a multi-year native spike in violent crime. A number of Republican lawmakers have cited Bowser’s opposition to bolster their very own arguments.

However Bowser has publicly said she doesn’t need Congress to become involved within the course of, whereas additionally citing congressional concern as proof of the validity of her personal objections.

“We don’t need any interference on our native laws,” she mentioned final week. “Fairly frankly, members of Congress have expressed comparable considerations. There’s lots of people that don’t agree with what the council did.”

New York Rep. Anthony Esposito, a former police officer, accused the D.C. Council of “empowering criminals on the expense of the general public,” and mentioned the brand new felony code would ”successfully stop the native justice system from holding criminals off of our streets, all whereas D.C. grapples with a crime wave.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the highest Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C’s nonvoting delegate within the Congress, spent many of the morning House debate enjoying protection. Norton mentioned the brand new necessary minimal penalties would nonetheless be larger than these for an identical crimes in a number of U.S. states.

Raskin accused House Republicans of ignoring their very own public dedication to states’ rights by finishing up a longstanding vendetta towards the D.C. authorities.

“That’s the fantastic thing about the federal system which I assumed our colleagues supported,” Raskin mentioned. “They’re not likely interested by scrutinizing the precise felony justice coverage. They only need to kick the folks of Washington, D.C., round. They need to lord it over them.”

After the vote, Norton launched an announcement saying, “D.C. residents, a majority of whom are Black and Brown, are worthy and able to governing themselves. It’s true Congress has absolute energy over D.C., however would possibly doesn’t make proper.”

The sweeping rewrite of D.C’s felony code has been years within the making; it was authorised unanimously final 12 months by the 13-member D.C. Council and carries the assist of main stakeholders, together with D.C. Lawyer Common Brian Schwalb.

“Right now’s transfer to overturn our laws just isn’t about making the District safer or extra simply,” Schwalb mentioned in a post-vote assertion. “Right now’s actions are political grandstanding and spotlight the pressing want for D.C. statehood.”

The measure to grant noncitizens, together with immigrants residing within the U.S. illegally, the best to vote in native elections just isn’t distinctive. Comparable measures have handed in a number of jurisdictions across the nation, together with Takoma Park, Maryland — a liberal bastion on the outskirts of Washington that’s Raskin’s house district. However a number of Republican critics claimed that the distinctive nature of D.C. with its a whole lot of international embassies, made it notably inappropriate.

Official estimates set the variety of noncitizen D.C. residents at round 50,000, out of a complete inhabitants of slightly below 700,000 residents.

“For years, Democrats in Washington decried potential international affect in our electoral course of, however D.C.’s new legislation probably permits international brokers from China, Russia, and different adversaries to take part in native elections held inside this nation’s capital metropolis,” mentioned Rep. Nicholas Langworthy, R-N.Y.

Norton, in a Wednesday night time debate over the voting legislation, name the congressional intervention “paternalistic” and mentioned it violated fundamental democratic beliefs of native self-governance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *