A Pennsylvania Chick-fil-A will not enable unaccompanied kids and youths to dine at its location.
On Feb. 22, Chick-fil-A’s franchise location in Royersford incited debate after introducing the brand new coverage.
The announcement, which was issued on the placement’s Fb web page, pointed to a sequence of “unacceptable behaviors” behind its choice. Loud quantity (peppered with express language), mistreatment of property, mistreatment of workers and unsafe behaviors have been cited as a part of the choice.
“We wish to present a cushty and secure surroundings for our friends and our workers, and likewise to guard our constructing,” the publish learn. “Due to this fact, we can not enable this to proceed. In consequence, to dine in our restaurant, anybody below the age of 16 is required to be accompanied by an grownup.”
The franchise thanked these “unaccompanied kids and youths” that had visited the placement and “acted appropriately,” whereas additionally iterating to oldsters that they weren’t “blaming them.”
“Kids and youths are studying to navigate the world free from supervision and infrequently push the boundaries,” the publish continued. “We merely can’t allow them to push these boundaries anymore at our restaurant. We encourage you to speak to your kids and ask about behaviors they’ve seen and maybe participated in.”
Although not permitted to remain on the restaurant with out grownup supervision, the franchise famous that teenagers may order meals to go.
TODAY.com reached out to each the Chick-fil-A Royersford location and Chick-fil-A headquarters concerning the choice however has not heard again from both as of this story’s publication.
Over 300 feedback have flooded the announcement on Fb. The overall response has primarily favored the placement’s alternative, with many customers expressing their frustration over their experiences on the chain.
“I witnessed a gaggle of those children a number of weeks again on a Saturday whereas attempting to seize lunch, and I gotta say, I’m stunned it took you this lengthy to say one thing,” one particular person commented. “Their habits was terrible and made for an uncomfortable expertise attempting to take pleasure in lunch. I absolutely assist your choice and am sorry you’ve been coping with it for thus lengthy.”
“Though I don’t agree with lots of CFA’s insurance policies, I strongly agree with this one,” one other replied. “It’s too unhealthy a restaurant has to punish all for the unhealthy behaviors of some, and VERY upset that these children aren’t studying manners and methods to behave at residence. Want dad and mom and guardians to step up!”
“Boundaries should be established for the well being and security of your workers and clients,” one other person replied. “I applaud Chick-fil-A for taking steps to make sure such.”
It’s not the primary time an eatery has put a ban on unsupervised minors and made headlines for it.
In early February, the New Jersey-based restaurant Nettie’s Home of Spaghetti introduced that it might not allow kids below the age of 10 to dine at its location. The restaurant defined that excessive challenges resembling “noise ranges, lack of house for prime chairs,” and “loopy messes” had gone into the choice for the ban.
In 2021, Pink Rooster Burgers and Grill — a family-owned spot in Backyard Valley, California — shared its new coverage, which might stop kids below 18 from eating with out an grownup. The restaurant famous that incidents worse have been “when faculty is in session” and perpetuated by greater than a single group of youngsters.
